ICANN New gTLD Application

The .WME TLD will benefit the registrants and internet users directly in multiple ways by providing an immediately identifiable and exclusive domain for WME clients, or others with need to access the WME websites.

18b (i) The goal of .WME is to provide an exclusive, trusted, safe WME-branded domain to be used to represent WME, and introduce new innovative non-registry related services in the talent agency business. WME will provide a trusted platform for its high profile artists and brands to project authenticated identification, accountability and transparency to both talent buyers and Internet users under WME’s brand name.

Trust and authenticity in the operation of .WME is paramount to WME and its partners. This is built through (i) a safe, secure, and trusted technical operation of the TLD by the back-end operator; and (ii) the eligibility requirements and registration policy for WME to register domains under .WME as a single registrant gTLD managed exclusively by WME.

18b (ii) .WME will advance the current space of competition, differentiation and innovation by branding itself directly as a TLD. This is a new initiative on the Internet and WME looks forward to supplying all users interacting with WME a direct and easy way of remembering the WME website and online brand. The .WME TLD will provide competition to gTLDs and ccTLDs that otherwise might be used. .WME will be restricted to WME thereby instilling trust and authentication so that any user is assured that any business transaction or enquiry conducted is made with the official representative of WME.

18b (iii) When visiting .WME sites, talent buyers and Internet users are provided an immediate identification and a level of confidence and trust not available today in the talent agency business and also not online with other existing TLDs. The exclusivity of domains under .WME has provided the opportunity for WME to manually review every single registration through their established process prior to domain name registration. The process as described includes check points and authorization by WME executives to avoid any illegitimate registrations.

Most high profile artists and brands are difficult to access and use talent agencies such as WME to represent their interests and serve as gatekeepers to any enquiry relating to booking. Trust with WME is hence a paramount concern for WME’s existing business activities.

The .WME domains will reduce exposure to unlicensed websites claiming to be official agents to WME clientele, while serving official, authenticated and high quality relevant content to search engines that can in turn better rank .WME domains for terms associated with the business activities relating to the WME brands. It is expected that search engines will modify their algorithms to accommodate relevant, high quality and unique content, especially if it can be used as a filter to counter unofficial websites, which is the case with .WME domains. The official Google Blog highlights the new Google algorithm changes (http:⁄⁄insidesearch.blogspot.com⁄2012⁄02⁄search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html) that will be leveraged by WME to benefit entities searching for WME brands online.

18b (iv) To reach the above mentioned goals, WME has implemented a single-registrant methodology of registering domains as measures to protect intellectual property rights of the major brands they represent in registrations under .WME and to ensure that .WME domains are used in a manner benefitting the existing WME culture and way of conducting business.

The policies and protections are built to match existing WME procedures in business management with their clientele; the ICANN established criteria; based on experience from the previous ICANN new gTLD introductions; and they are established to ensure a much higher security level for .WME domains than what is considered standard requirements for gTLDs.

The .WME TLD will be launched with all the standard gTLD registration rules except that registrations will be made by a single registrant: WME. See response to question #27 for .WME lifecycle.

WME will adhere to all ICANN mandated rights protection mechanisms and consensus policies.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMNETS AND REGISTRATION PROCESS
WME domain names can solely be registered by WME. There will be a multi-stage internal process to identify, register and bring live all .WME domains. This process will include an executive authorization for .WME domain name registrations. It includes existing WME business processes and is considered confidential to WME. It can be provided under a confidentiality agreement.

RESERVATION PROTECTION: second-level names will be reserved per the requirements in the ICANN Registry Agreement Specification 5, including country-territory names (see response #22).

RIGHTS PROTECTION AND NOTIFICATIONS SYSTEM:
• Trademark Clearing House will be implemented in accordance with ICANN specifications.
• Names Selection Policy ensuring that only names authorized and verified by WME are registered as domains under .WME.

ONE TIME-RESTRICTED LAUNCH PHASE: The .WME launch will be initiated with a Sunrise restricted registration phase. In this phase only registrations that fulfill the eligibility requirement established above and that fulfill the ICANN established Sunrise criteria per the 11 January 2012 ICANN Applicant Guidebook Trademark Clearing House Specification, section 7.2 (or any subsequent versions that update that). Multiple applications for the same domain will not be possible since WME is the only single-registrant allowed to make registrations.

Following the completion of the Sunrise phase .WME domains will be available for WME to register outside the Sunrise requirements but still solely through the above established procedure and eligibility requirement.

ANTI-ABUSE POLICY FOR .WME; incorporated in the registration agreement for all .WME registrations. It is in place to assure any registration made under .WME will not be used for malicious conduct or in a manner that can lead to security and stability issues for the registry, registrars, and registrants, and general users of the Internet. It is detailed in response to question #28.

The anti-abuse policy is not a replacement for alleged violation of the Trademark PDDRP⁄UDRP⁄URS, which shall be enforced under the provisions contained therein.

18b (v) The .WME TLD will use best practices around privacy and data protection, especially since .WME is a single registrant TLD. CentralNIC, the back-end service provider will administer specific WHOIS protections per response to question #26, and promote WHOIS accuracy per response to question #28. Data validation of WHOIS information, as discussed broadly in the ICANN community, will not be necessary under .WME as there will be one registrant only and WME will supply valid WHOIS information to be associated with its registrations so that anyone can contact WME with inquiries concerning its domain name registrations.

Artists and brands seek to have as much visibility and exposure as possible to market themselves and their business activities. WME will provide this unique and branded visibility through its .WME domain that will cater exclusively to its high profile clientele.

In order to meet the benefits described in responses to 18b (i-v) WME will facilitate its existing outreach and communication efforts to include the .WME TLD in its continued efforts to build and expand its brand as the talent agency leader catering to the needs and business interests of their high profile artists and brands based on trust and authenticity.

William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME) has chosen CentralNic as the registry infrastructure provider for the .WME TLD. Please see attached Appendix 23.1 for the acceptance letter from CentralNic. Any information regarding technical and operational capability of the proposed the TLD registry (responses to questions 23 – 44) therefore refers to CentralNic’s registry infrastructure systems.

Throughout the responses to question #23-44 in this application it should be noted that while WME is a single registrant-registry (as established in response to question #18) the responses still treat .WME as a standard gTLD. As a result, in some cases added protection is available without this being explicitly stated each time throughout responses to question #23-44. For example, in the case of registrar accreditation WME anticipates that only one registrar will be accredited under .WME, while still being open to any interested registrar per the ICANN requirements and as such the application speaks often about ʺregistrarsʺ.

WME and CentralNic hereby explicitly confirm that all registry services stated below are engineered and will be provided in a manner compliant with the new gTLD Registry Agreement, ICANN consensus policies (such as Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy and AGP Limits Policy) and applicable technical standards. Except for the registry services described below, no other services will be provided by the Registry that relate to (i) receipt of data from registrars concerning registrations of domain names and name servers; (ii) provision to registrars of status information relating to the zone servers for the TLD;(iii) dissemination of TLD zone files; (iv) operation of the Registry zone servers; or (v) dissemination of contact and other information concerning domain name server registrations in the TLD as required by the Registry Agreement.

WME will provide the Zone File FTP (or other Registry supported) service for an ICANN-specified and managed URL for the user to access the Registry’s zone data archives. WME will grant the user a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited right to access WME’s Zone File FTP server, and to transfer a copy of the top-level domain zone files, and any associated cryptographic checksum files no more than once per 24 hour period using FTP, or other data transport and access protocols that may be prescribed by ICANN.

WME will provide zone files using a sub-format of the standard Master File format as originally defined in RFC 1035, Section 5, including all the records present in the
actual zone used in the public DNS.

WME, through CZDA Provider, will provide each user with access to the zone file for a period of not less than three (3) months. WME will allow users to renew their Grant of Access.

WME will provide, and CZDA Provider will facilitate, access to the zone file to user at no cost.

23.4. Operation of the Registry Zone Servers
The TLD zone will be served from CentralNicʹs authoritative DNS system. This system has operated at 100% service availability since 1996 and has been developed into a secure and stable platform for domain resolution. Partnering with Community DNS, CentralNicʹs DNS system includes nameservers in more than forty cities, on five continents. The DNS system fully complies with all relevant RFCs and all ICANN specifications, and has been engineered to ensure resilience and stability in the face of denial-of-service attacks, with substantial overhead and geographical dispersion.
The DNS system is described further in response to question #35.

23.5. Dissemination of Contact and Other Information Concerning Domain Name Server Registrations
CentralNic will operate a Whois service for the TLD. The Whois service will provide information about domain names, contact objects, and name server objects stored in the Shared Registry System via a port-43 service compliant with RFC 3912. The Whois service will permit interested parties to obtain information about the Registered Name Holder, Administrative, Technical and Billing contacts for domain names. The Whois service will return records in a standardized format which complies with ICANN
specifications.

CentralNic will provide access to the Whois service at no cost to the general public.
CentralNicʹs Whois service supports a number of features, including rate limiting to prevent abuse, privacy protections for natural persons, and a secure Searchable Whois Service. The Whois service is more fully described in response to question #26.
Should ICANN specify alternative formats and protocols for the dissemination of Domain Name Registration Data, CentralNic will implement such alternative specifications as soon as reasonably practicable.

23.6. DNSSEC
The TLD zone will be signed by DNSSEC. CentralNic uses the award-winning signer technology from Xelerance Corporation. Zone files will be signed using NSEC3 with opt-out, following a DNSSEC Practice Statement detailed in response to question #43.
CentralNicʹs DNSSEC implementation complies with RFCs 4033, 4034, 4035, 4509 and follows the best practices described in RFC 4641. Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence (NSEC3) will be implemented, which complies with RFC 5155. The SRS will accept public-key material from child domain names in a secure manner according to industry best practices (specifically the secDNS EPP extension, described in RFC 5910). CentralNic will also publish in its website the DNSSEC Practice Statements (DPS) describing critical security controls and procedures for key material storage, access and usage for its own keys and secure acceptance of registrants’ public-key material. CentralNic will publish its DPS following the format described in the “DPS-framework” Internet Draft within 180 days after that draft becomes an RFC.

23.7. Rights Protection Mechanisms
WME will provide all mandatory Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPM) that are specified in the ICANN Applicant Guidebook (version 11 January 2012 or any subsequent version thereof). This includes the Trademark Claims Service (section 6.1) and Sunrise service (section 6.2) and all required RPM-related policies and procedures such as UDRP, URS, and PDDRP will be adopted and used in the TLD. More information is available in response to question #29.

WME will include all ICANN mandated and independently developed RPMs in the registry-registrar agreement entered into by ICANN-accredited registrars authorized to register names in the TLD. WME will implement these mechanisms in accordance with requirements established by ICANN each of the mandatory RPMs set forth in the ICANN Registry Agreement.

The EPP extension (described above and in response to question #25) will be used to implement an SRS interface during the Sunrise period for the TLD. Depending on the final specification for the Trademark Claims Service (details of which have not yet been published), an additional EPP extension may be required in order to implement this service. If this is necessary, the extension will be designed to minimize its effect on the operation of the SRS and the requirements on registrars.

23.8. Registrar Support and Account Management
CentralNic will leverage its 16 years of experience of supporting over 1,500 registrars to provide high-quality 24x7 support and account management for the TLD registrars. All TLD registrars will be required to be ICANN accredited. CentralNicʹs experienced technical and customer support personnel will assist the TLD registrars during the on-boarding and OT&E process, and provide responsive personal support via email, phone and a web based support ticketing system.

23.9. Reporting to ICANN
WME and CentralNic will compile and transmit a monthly report to ICANN relating to the TLD. This report will comply with Specification 3 of the New gTLD Registry Agreement.

23.10. Personnel Resources of CentralNic
The technical, operations and support functions of the registry will be performed in-house by CentralNicʹs personnel. These personnel perform these functions on a full-time basis.

23.10.1. Technical Operations
Technical Operations refers to the deployment, maintenance, monitoring and security of the registry system, including the SRS and the other critical registry functions. Technical Operations staff design, build, deploy and maintain the technical infrastructure that supports the registry system, including power distribution, network design, access control, monitoring and logging services, and server and database administration. Internal helpdesk and incident reporting is also performed by the Technical Operations team. The Technical Operations team performs 24x7 monitoring and support for the registry system and mans the Network Operations Centre (NOC) from which all technical activities are coordinated.

CentralNic intends to maintain a Technical Operations team consisting of the following positions. These persons will be responsible for managing, developing and monitoring the registry system for the TLD on a 24x7 basis:
• Senior Operations Engineer(s)
• Operations Engineer(s)
• Security Engineer

23.10.2. Technical Development
The Technical Development team develops and maintains the software which implements the critical registry functions, including the EPP, Whois, Zone file generation, data escrow, reporting, backoffice and web-based management systems (intranet and extranet), and open-source registrar toolkit software. All critical registry software has been developed and maintained in-house by this team.

CentralNic intends to maintain a Technical Development team consisting of the following positions. These persons will be responsible for maintaining and developing the registry software which will support the TLD:
• Senior Technical Developer x 2
• Technical Developer x 3

23.10.3. Technical Support
Technical Support refers to 1st, 2nd and 3rd line support for registrars and in limited situations for end-users (end-user support is otherwise typically managed by registrars; although it should be noted that for this application WME is the single registrant for domains registered under the TLD). Areas covered include technical support for systems and services, billing and account management. CentralNic and WME support personnel also deal with compliance and legal issues such as implementing UDRP and URS proceeding results, abuse reports and enquiries from law enforcement.
1st line support issues are normally dealt with by these personnel. 2nd and 3rd line support issues (relating to functional or operational issues with the registry system) are escalated to Technical Operations or Technical Development as necessary.

The Technical Support team will consist of the following positions:
• Operations Manager
• Support Manager
• Support Agent(s)
Our overseas account managers also perform basic support functions, escalating to the support agents in London where necessary.

23.10.4. Key Personnel

23.10.4.1. Gavin Brown - Chief Technology Officer
Gavin has worked at CentralNic since 2001, becoming CTO in 2005. He has overall responsibility for all aspects of the SRS, Whois, DNS and DNSSEC systems. He is a respected figure in the domain industry and has been published in several professional technical journals, and co-authored a book on the Perl programming language. He also participates in a number of technical, public policy and advocacy groups and several open source projects. Gavin has a BSc (hons) in Physics from the University of Kent.

23.10.4.2. Jenny White - Operations Manager
Jenny has been with CentralNic for nine years. Throughout this time she has expertly managed customer relations with external partners, prepared new domain launch processes and documentation, managed daily support and maintenance for over 1,500 Registrars, carried out extensive troubleshooting within the registrar environment to ensure optimum usability for registrars across communication platforms, handled domain disputes (from mediation to WIPO filing), and liaised with WIPO to implement changes to the Dispute Resolution Procedure when necessary.

23.10.4.3. Adam Armstrong - Senior Operations Engineer
Adam has recently joined CentralNic as Senior Operations Engineer. In this role he is responsible for the operation and development of the system and network infrastructure for the registry system. Adam has previously worked at a number of large UK ISPs including Jersey Telecom and Packet Exchange. He is also the lead developer of Observium, a network management system used by ICANN (amongst others). Adam has brought his strong knowledge of network design, management and security to bear at CentralNic and will oversee the operation of the SRS for the TLD.

23.10.4.4. Milos Negovanovic - Senior Technical Developer
Milos has worked at CentralNic since 2009. He has a background in building rich web applications and protocol servers. His main areas of responsibility are the Registrar Console, EPP and backoffice functions.

23.10.4.5. Mary OʹFlaherty - Senior Technical Developer
Mary has worked at CentralNic since 2008. She plays an integral role in the ongoing design, development and maintenance of the registry as a whole and has specific experience with the EPP system, Registrar Console and Staff Console. Mary has a 1st class Honors degree in Computer Science from University College Cork and has previously worked for Intel and QAD Ireland.

23.10.5. Job Descriptions
CentralNic will recruit a number of new employees to perform technical duties in relation to the TLD and other gTLDs. The following job descriptions will be used to define these roles and select candidates with suitable skills and experience.

23.10.5.1. Operations Engineer
Operations Engineers assist in the maintenance and development of the network and server infrastructure of the registry system. Operations Engineers have a good knowledge of the TCP⁄IP protocol stack and related technologies, and are familiar with best practice in the areas of network design and management and system administration. They should be competent system administrators with a good knowledge of Unix system administration, and some knowledge of shell scripting, software development and databases. Operations Engineers have 1-2 yearʹs relevant commercial experience. Operations Engineers report to and work with the Senior Operations Engineer, who provides advice and mentoring. Operations Engineers participate in manning the NOC on a 24x7 basis and in the on-call shift rotation.

23.10.5.2. Security Engineer
Security Engineers enhance and assure the security of the registry system. Day-to-day responsibilities are: responding to security incidents, performing analysis and remediating vulnerabilities, conducting tests of access controls, refining system configuration to improve security, training other team members, reviewing source code, maintaining security policies and procedures, and gathering intelligence relating to threats to the registry. Security Engineers have 1-2 yearʹs relevant commercial experience. This role reports to and works with the Senior Operations Engineer and CTO. Security Engineers participate in manning the NOC on a 24x7 basis and participate in the on-call shift rotation.

23.10.5.3. Technical Developer
Technical Developers maintain the software which supports the registry. Day-to-day responsibilities are developing new systems in response to requests from management and customers, correcting bugs in existing software, and improving its performance. Technical Developers have a good knowledge of general programming practices including use of revision control and code review systems. Developers have a good awareness of security issues, such as those described in advisories published by the oWASP Project. Developers have at least one yearsʹ commercial experience in developing applications in programming languages such as PHP, Perl, and Python, although knowledge of domain technologies such as EPP and DNS is not critical. Technical Developers work as part of a team, with advice and mentoring from the Senior Technical Developers, to whom they report.

23.10.6. Resource Matrix
To provide a means to accurately and objectively predict human resource requirements for the operation of the registry system, CentralNic has developed a Resourcing Matrix, which assigns a proportion of each employeeʹs available time to each aspect of registry activities. These activities include technical work such as operations and development, as well as technical support, registrar account management, rights protection, abuse prevention, and financial activity such as payroll, cash collection, etc. This matrix then permits the calculation of the total HR resource assigned to each area.
A copy of the Resourcing Matrix is included as Appendix 23.2. It is important to note that the available resources cover the operation of CentralNicʹs entire registry operations: this includes CentralNicʹs own domain registry portfolio (uk.com, us.com, etc.), the .LA ccTLD, as well as the gTLDs which CentralNic will provide registry service for.

The actual proportion of human technical resources required specifically for the TLD is determined by the relative size of the TLD to the rest of CentralNicʹs operations. This calculation is based on the projected number of domains after three years of operation: the scenario is used to ensure that sufficient personnel are on hand to meet periods of enhanced demand. CentralNic has calculated that, if all its TLD clients are successful in their applications, and all meet their projections after three years, its registry system will be required to support up to 4.5 million domain names.

Since the projection for the number of domains registered in the TLD after three years is 2,000, the TLD will therefore require 0.04% of CentralNicʹs total available HR resources in order operate fully and correctly. In the event that registration volumes exceed this figure, CentralNic will proactively increase the size of the Technical Operations, Technical Development and support teams to ensure that the needs of the TLD are fully met. Revenues from the additional registration volumes will fund the salaries of these new hires. Nevertheless, CentralNic is confident that the staffing outlined above is sufficient to meet the needs of the TLD for at least the first 18 months of operation.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of the WME outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.

24.1. Registry Type
CentralNic operates a ʺthickʺ registry in which the registry maintains copies of all information associated with registered domains. Registrars maintain their own copies of registration information, thus registry-registrar synchronization is required to ensure that both registry and registrar have consistent views of the technical and contact information associated with registered domains. The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) adopted supports the thick registry model. See response to question #25 for further details.

24.2. Architecture
Figure 24.1 provides a diagram of the overall configuration of the SRS. This diagram should be viewed in the context of the overall architecture of the registry system described in response to question #32.
The SRS is hosted at CentralNicʹs primary operations centre in London. It is connected to the public Internet via two upstream connections, one of which is provided by Qube. Figure 32.1 provides a diagram of the outbound network connectivity. Interconnection with upstream transit providers is via two BGP routers which connect to the firewalls which implement access controls over registry services.

Within the firewall boundary, connectivity is provided to servers by means of resilient gigabit ethernet switches implementing Spanning Tree Protocol.

The registry system implements two interfaces to the SRS: the standard EPP system (described in response to question #25) and the Registrar Console (described in response to question #31). These systems interact with the primary registry database (described in response to question #33). The database is the central repository of all registry data. Other registry services also interact with this database.

An internal ʺStaff Consoleʺ is used by CentralNic personnel to perform management of the registry system.

24.3. EPP System Architecture
A description of the characteristics of the EPP system is provided in response to question #25. This response describes the infrastructure which supports the EPP system.
A network diagram for the EPP system is provided in Figure 24.2. The EPP system is hosted at the primary operations centre in London. During failover conditions, the EPP system operates from the Isle of Man Disaster Recovery site (see response to question #34).
CentralNic’s EPP system has a three-layer logical and physical architecture, consisting of load balancers, a cluster of front-end protocol servers, and a pool of application servers. Each layer can be scaled horizontally in order to meet demand.

Registrars establish TLS-secured TCP connections to the load balancers on TCP port 700. Load is balanced using DNS round-robin load balancing.
The load balancers pass sessions to the EPP protocol servers. Load is distributed using a weighted-least-connections algorithm. The protocol servers run the Apache web server with the mod_epp and mod_proxy_balancer modules. These servers process session commands (〈hello〉, 〈login〉 and 〈logout〉) and function as reverse proxies for query and transform commands, converting them into plain HTTP requests which are then distributed to the application servers. EPP commands are distributed using a weighted-least-connections algorithm.

Application servers receives EPP commands as plain HTTP requests, which are handled using application business logic. Application servers process commands and prepare responses which are sent back to the protocol servers, which return responses to clients over EPP sessions.
Each component of the system is resilient: multiple inbound connections, redundant power, high availability firewalls, load balancers and application server clusters enable seamless operation in the event of component failure. This architecture also allows for arbitrary horizontal scaling: commodity hardware is used throughout the system and can be rapidly added to the system, without disruption, to meet an unexpected growth in demand.

The EPP system will comprise of the following systems:
• 4x load balancers (1U rack mount servers with quad-core Intel processors, 16GB RAM, 40GB solid-state disk drives, running the CentOS operating system using the Linux Virtual Server [see http:⁄⁄www.linuxvirtualserver.org⁄])
• 8x EPP protocol servers (1U rack mount servers with dual-core Intel processors, 16GB RAM, running the CentOS operating system using Apache and mod_epp)
• 20x application servers (1U rack mount servers with dual-core Intel processors, 4GB of RAM, running the CentOS operating system using Apache and PHP)

24.3.1. mod_epp
mod_epp is an Apache server module which adds support for the EPP transport protocol to Apache. This permits implementation of an EPP server using the various features of Apache, including CGI scripts and other dynamic request handlers, reverse proxies, and even static files. mod_epp was originally developed by Nic.at, the Austrian ccTLD registry. Since its release, a large number of ccTLD and other registries have deployed it and continue to support its development and maintenance. Further information can be found at http:⁄⁄sourceforge.net⁄projects⁄aepps. CentralNic uses mod_epp to manage EPP sessions with registrar clients, and to convert EPP commands into HTTP requests which can then be handled by backend application servers.

24.3.2. mod_proxy_balancer
mod_proxy_balancer is a core Apache module. Combined with the mod_proxy module, it implements a load-balancing reverse proxy, and includes a number of load balancing algorithms and automated failover between members of a cluster. CentralNic uses mod_proxy_balancer to distribute EPP commands to backend application servers.

24.4. Performance
CentralNic performs continuous remote monitoring of its EPP system, and this monitoring includes measuring the performance of various parts of the system. As of writing, the average round-trip times (RTTs) for various functions of the EPP system were as follows:
• connect time: 87ms
• login time: 75ms
• hello time: 21ms
• check time: 123ms
• logout time: 20ms
These figures include an approximate latency of 2.4ms due to the distant between the monitoring site and the EPP system. They were recorded during normal weekday operations during the busiest time of the day (around 1300hrs UTC) and compare very favorably to the requirement of 4,000ms for session commands and 2,000ms for query commands defined in the new gTLD Service Level Agreement. RTTs for overseas registrars will be higher than this due to the greater distances involved, but will remain well within requirements.

24.5. Scaling
Horizontal scaling is preferred over vertical scaling. Horizontal scaling refers to the introduction of additional nodes into a cluster, while vertical scaling involves using more powerful equipment (more CPU cores, RAM etc.) in a single system. Horizontal scaling also encourages effective mechanisms to ensure high-availability, and eliminate single points of failure in the system.

Vertical scaling leverages Mooreʹs Law: when units are depreciated and replaced, the new equipment is likely to be significantly more powerful. If the average lifespan of a server in the system is three years, then its replacement is likely to be around four times as powerful as the old server.
For further information about Capacity Management and Scaling, please see response to question #32.

24.6. Registrar Console
The Registrar Console is a web-based registrar account management tool. It provides a secure and easy-to-use graphical interface to the SRS. It is hosted on a virtual platform at the primary operations centre in London. As with the rest of the registry system, during a failover condition it is operated from the Isle of Man. The virtual platform is described in Figure 24.3.

The features of the Registrar Console are described in response to question #31.

The virtual platform is a utility platform which supports systems and services which do not operate at significant levels of load, and which therefore do not require multiple servers or the additional performance that running on ʺbare metalʺ would provide. The platform functions as a private cloud, with redundant storage and failover between hosts.

The Registrar Console currently sustains an average of 6 page requests per minute during normal operations, with peak volumes of around 8 requests per minute. Volumes during weekends are significantly lower (less than 1 request per minute). Additional load resulting from this and other new gTLDs is expected to result in a trivial increase in Registrar Console request volumes, and CentralNic does not expect additional hardware resources to be required to support it.

24.7. Quality Assurance
CentralNic employs the following quality assurance (QA) methods:
1. 24x7x365 monitoring provides reports of incidents to NOC
2. Quarterly review of capacity, performance and reliability
3. Monthly reviews of uptime, latency and bandwidth consumption
4. Hardware depreciation schedules
5. Unit testing framework
6. Frequent reviews by QA working group
7. Schema validation and similar technologies to monitor compliance on a real-time, ongoing basis
8. Revision control software with online annotation and change logs
9. Bug Tracking system to which all employees have access
10. Code Review Policy in place to enforce peer review of all changes to core code prior to deployment
11. Software incorporates built-in error reporting mechanisms to detect flaws and report to Operations team
12. Four stage deployment strategy: development environment, staging for internal testing, OT&E deployment for registrar testing, and then finally production deployment
13. Evidence-based project scheduling
14. Specification development and revision
15. Weekly milestones for developers
16. Gantt charts and critical path analysis for project planning
Registry system updates are performed on an ongoing basis, with any user-facing updates (i.e. changes to the behavior of the EPP interface) being scheduled at specific times. Disruptive maintenance is scheduled for periods during which activity is lowest.

24.8. Billing
CentralNic operates a complex billing system for domain name registry services to ensure registry billing and collection services are feature rich, accurate, secure, and accessible to all registrars. The goal of the system is to maintain the integrity of data and create reports which are accurate, accessible, secured, and scalable. The foundation of the process is debit accounts established for each registrar. CentralNic will withdraw all domain fees from the registrar’s account on a per-transaction basis.

CentralNic will provide fee-incurring services (e.g., domain registrations, registrar transfers, domain renewals) to a registrar for as long as that registrar’s account shows a positive balance.

Once ICANN notifies WME that a registrar has been issued accreditation, CentralNic will begin the registrar on-boarding process, including setting up the registrarʹs financial account within the SRS.

24.9. Registrar Support
CentralNic provides a multi-tier support system on a 24x7 basis with the following support levels:
• 1st Level: initial support level responsible for basic customer issues. The first job of 1st Level personnel is to gather the customer’s information and to determine the customer’s issue by analyzing the symptoms and figuring out the underlying problem.
• 2nd Level: more in-depth technical support level than 1st Level support containing experienced and more knowledgeable personnel on a particular product or service. Technicians at this level are responsible for assisting 1st Level personnel solve basic technical problems and for investigating elevated issues by confirming the validity of the problem and seeking for known solutions related to these more complex issues.
• 3rd Level: the highest level of support in a three-tiered technical support model responsible for handling the most difficult or advanced problems. Level 3 personnel are experts in their fields and are responsible for not only assisting both 1st and 2nd level personnel, but with the research and development of solutions to new or unknown issues.

CentralNic provides a support ticketing system for tracking routine support issues. This is a web based system (available via the Registrar Console) allowing registrars to report new issues, follow up on previously raised tickets, and read responses from CentralNic support personnel.
When a new trouble ticket is submitted, it is assigned a unique ID and priority. The following priority levels are used:
1. Normal: general enquiry, usage question, or feature enhancement request. Handled by 1st level support.
2. Elevated: issue with a non-critical feature for which a work-around may or may not exist. Handled by 1st level support.
3. Severe: serious issue with a primary feature necessary for daily operations for which no work-around has been discovered and which completely prevents the feature from being used. Handled by 2nd level support.
4. Critical: A major production system is down or severely impacted. These issues are catastrophic outages that affect the overall Registry System operations. Handled by 3rd level support.

Depending on priority, different personnel will be alerted to the existence of the ticket. For example, a Priority 1 ticket will cause a notification to be emailed to the registrar customer support team, but a Priority 4 ticket will result in a broadcast message sent to the pagers of senior operations staff including the CTO. The system permits escalation of issues that are not resolved within target resolution times.

24.10. Validation of Eligibility Requirements
The SRS supports validation of eligibility requirements, as required by specific TLD policies.
Figure 24.4 describes the process by which registration requests can be validated. Prior to registration, the registrantʹs eligibility is validated by a Validation Agent. The registrant then instructs their registrar to register the domain. The SRS returns an ʺObject Pendingʺ result code (1001) to the registrar.

The request is sent to the Validation Agent by the registry. The Validation Agent either approves or rejects the request, having reconciled the registration information with that recorded during the eligibility validation. .WME registrations will not be initiated prior to the completion of the registration process mentioned in response to question #18 and as such is unlikely to take advantage of the CentralNic eligibility validation process as described.

24.11. Interconnectivity With Other Registry Systems
The registry system is based on multiple resilient stateless modules. The SRS, Whois, DNS and other systems do not directly interact with each other. Interactions are mediated by the database which is the single authoritative source of data for the registry as a whole. Individuals modules perform ʺCRUDʺ (create, read, update, delete) actions upon the database. These actions then affect the behavior of other registry systems: for example, when a registrar adds the ʺclientHoldʺ status to a domain object, this is recorded in the database. When a query is received for this domain via the Whois service, the presence of this status code in the database results in the ʺStatus: CLIENT HOLDʺ appearing in the whois record. It will also be noted by the zone generation system, resulting in the temporary removal of the delegation of the domain name from the DNS.

24.12. Resilience
The SRS has a stateless architecture designed to be fully resilient in order to provide an uninterrupted service in the face of failure or one or more parts of the system. This is achieved by use of redundant hardware and network connections, and by use of continuous ʺheartbeatʺ monitoring allowing dynamic and high-speed failover from active to standby components, or between nodes in an active-active cluster. These technologies also permit rapid scaling of the system to meet short-term increases in demand during ʺsurgeʺ periods, such as during the initial launch of a new TLD.

24.12.1. Synchronization between Servers and Sites
CentralNicʹs system is implemented as multiple stateless systems which interact via a central registry database. As a result, there are only a few situations where synchronization of data between servers is necessary:
1. Replication of data between active and standby servers (see response to question #33). CentralNic implements redundancy in its database system by means of an active⁄standby database cluster. The database system used by CentralNic supports native real-time replication of data allowing operation of a reliable hot standby server. Automated heartbeat monitoring and failover is implemented to ensure continued access to the database following a failure of the primary database system.
2. Replication is used to synchronize the primary operations centre with the Disaster Recovery site hosted in the Isle of Man (see response to question #34). Database updates are replicated to the DR site in real-time via a secured VPN, providing a ʺhotʺ backup site which can be used to provide registry services in the event of a failure at the primary site.

24.13. Operational Testing and Evaluation (OT&E)
An Operational Testing and Evaluation (OT&E) environment is provided for registrars to develop and test their systems. The OT&E system replicates the SRS in a clean-room environment. Access to the OT&E system is unrestricted and unlimited: registrars can freely create multiple OT&E accounts via the Registrar Console.

24.14. Resourcing
As can be seen in the Resourcing Matrix found in Appendix 23.2, CentralNic will maintain a team of full-time developers and engineers which will contribute to the development and maintenance of this aspect of the registry system. These developers and engineers will not work on specific subsystems full-time, but a certain percentage of their time will be dedicated to each area. The total HR resource dedicated to this area is equivalent to more than one full-time post.
CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

CentralNicʹs resourcing model assumes that the ʺdedicatedʺ resourcing required for the TLD (i.e., that required to deal with issues related specifically to the TLD and not to general issues with the system as a whole) will be equal to the proportion of the overall registry system that the TLD will use. After three years of operation, the projection for the TLD states that there will be 2,000 domains in the zone. CentralNic has calculated that, if all its TLD clients are successful in their applications, and all meet their projections after three years, its registry system will be required to support up to 4.5 million domain names. Therefore the TLD will require 0.04% of the total resources available for this area of the registry system.

In the event that registration volumes exceed this figure, CentralNic will proactively increase the size of the Technical Operations, Technical Development and support teams to ensure that the needs of the TLD are fully met. Revenues from the additional registration volumes will fund the salaries of these new hires. Nevertheless, CentralNic is confident that the staffing outlined above is sufficient to meet the needs of the TLD for at least the first 18 months of operation.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.

The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) is an application layer client-server protocol for the provisioning and management of objects stored in a shared central repository. EPP defines generic object management operations and an extensible framework that maps protocol operations to objects. EPP has become established as the common protocol by which domain registrars can manage domains, nameservers and contact details held by domain registries. It is widely deployed in the gTLD and ccTLD registry space.

CentralNic has operated its EPP system since 2005, and it currently operates at significant load in terms of registrars, sessions and transaction volumes. CentralNicʹs EPP system is fully compliant with the following RFC specifications:
• 5730 - Base Protocol
• 5731 - domains
• 5732 - Host Objects
• 5733 - Contact Objects
• 5734 - TCP Transport
• 3735 - Extension Guidelines
• 3915 - RGP Extension
• 5910 - DNSSEC Extension

25.1. Description of Interface
EPP is a stateful XML protocol layered over TCP (see RFC 3734). Protected using lower-layer security protocols, clients exchange identification, authentication, and option information, and engage in a series of client-initiated command-response exchanges. All EPP commands are atomic (there is no partial success or partial failure) and designed so that they can be made idempotent (executing a command more than once has the same net effect on system state as successfully executing the command once).

EPP provides four basic service elements: service discovery, commands, responses, and an extension framework that supports definition of managed objects and the relationship of protocol requests and responses to those objects.
EPP servers respond to client-initiated communication (which can be either a lower-layer connection request or an EPP service discovery message) by returning a greeting to a client. The server then responds to each EPP command with a coordinated response that describes the results of processing the command.

EPP commands fall into three categories: session management, queries, and transform commands. Session management commands are used to establish and end persistent sessions with an EPP server. Query commands perform read-only object information retrieval operations. Transform commands perform read-write object management operations.

Commands are processed by a server in the order they are received from a client. The protocol includes features that allow for offline review of transform commands before the requested action is completed. In such situations, the response clearly notes that the command has been received but that the requested action is pending. The corresponding object then reflects processing of the pending action. The server will also notify the client when offline processing of the action has been completed. Object mappings describe standard formats for notices that describe completion of offline processing.

EPP uses XML namespaces to provide an extensible object management framework and to identify schemas required for XML instance parsing and validation. These namespaces and schema definitions are used to identify both the base protocol schema and the schemas for managed objects.

25.1.1. Objects supported
Registrars may create and manage the following object types in the CentralNic EPP system:
• domains (RFC 5731)
• host objects (RFC 5732)
• contact objects (RFC 5733)

25.1.2. Commands supported
CentralNic supports the following EPP commands:
• 〈hello〉 - retrieve the 〈greeting〉 from the server
• 〈login〉 and 〈logout〉 - session management
• 〈poll〉 - message queue management
• 〈check〉 - availability check
• 〈info〉 - object information
• 〈create〉 - create object
• 〈update〉 - update object
• 〈renew〉 - renew object
• 〈delete〉 - delete object
• 〈transfer〉 - manage object transfer

25.2. EPP state diagram
Figure 25.1 describes the state machine for the EPP system. Clients establish a connection with the server, which sends a greeting. Clients then authenticate, and once a login session is established, submits commands and receive responses until the server closes the connection, the client sends a logout command, or a timeout is reached.

25.3. EPP Object Policies
The following policies apply to objects provisioned via the EPP system:

25.3.1. Domains
1. Domains must comply with the syntax described in RFC 1035 §2.3.1. Additionally, the first label of the name must be between 3 and 63 characters in length.
2. Domains must have a registrant attribute which is associated with a contact object in the database.
3. Domains must have an administrative contact attribute which is associated with a contact object in the database.
4. Domains must have a technical contact which attribute is associated with a contact object in the database.
5. Domains may have an billing contact attribute which is associated with a contact object in the database.
6. Domains may have between 0 (zero) and 13 DNS servers. A domain with no name servers will not resolve and no records will be published in the DNS.
7. The host object model for domains is used rather than the host attribute model.
8. Domains may have a number of status codes. The presence of certain status codes indicates the domainʹs position in the lifecycle, described further in response to question #27.
9. Where policy requires, the server may respond to a 〈domain:create〉 command with an ʺObject Pendingʺ (1001) response. When this occurs, the domain is placed onto the pendingCreate status while an out-of-band validation process takes place.
10. When registered, the expiry date of a domain may be set up to ten years from the initial date of registration. Registrars can specify registration periods in one-year increments from one to ten.
11. When renewed, the expiry date of a domain may be set up to ten years from the current expiry date. Registrars can specify renewal periods in one-year increments from one to ten. Domains which auto-renew are renewed for one year at a time.
12. Domains must have an authInfo code which is used to authenticate inter-registrar transfer requests. This authInfo code may contain up to 48 bytes of UTF-8 character data.
13. Domains may have one or more DS records associated with them. DS records are managed via the secDNS EPP extension, as specified in RFC 5910.
14. Only the sponsoring registrar of the domain may submit 〈update〉, 〈renew〉 or 〈delete〉 commands for the domain.

25.3.2. Host objects
1. Host names must comply with RFC 1035. The maximum length of the host name may not exceed 255 characters.
2. In-bailiwick hosts must have an IPv4 address. They may optionally have an IPv6 address.
3. Multiple IP addresses are not currently permitted.
4. Sponsorship of hosts is determined as follows: if an object is in-bailwick (i.e. child of a domain in the database, and therefore also child to a TLD in the system), then the sponsor is the sponsor of the parent domain. If the object is out-of-bailiwick, the sponsor is the registrar which created the contact.
5. If a registrar submits a change to the name of a host object, if the new host name is subordinate to an in-bailiwick domain, then that registrar must be the sponsor of the new parent domain.
6. Registrars are not permitted to create hosts that are subordinate to a non-existent in-bailiwick domain, or to change the name of a host object so that it is subordinate to a non-existent in-bailiwick domain.
7. A host cannot be deleted if one or more domains are delegated to it (the registry deletes hosts to remove orphan glue, see response to question #28).
8. Inter-registrar transfers are not permitted.
9. Only the sponsoring registrar of the host may submit 〈update〉 or 〈delete〉 commands for the object.

25.3.3. Contact objects
1. Contact IDs may only contain characters from the set [A-Z, 0-9, . (period), - (hyphen) and - (underscore)] and are case-insensitive.
2. Phone numbers and email addresses must be valid as described in RFC 5733 §2.5 and §2.6.
3. Contact information is accepted and stored in ʺinternationalizedʺ format only: that is, contact objects only have a single 〈contact:postalInfo〉 element and the type attribute is always ʺintʺ.
4. The 〈contact:org〉, 〈contact:sp〉, 〈contact:pc〉, 〈contact:phone〉 and 〈contact:fax〉 elements are optional.
5. Contacts must have an authInfo code which is used in inter-registrar transfers. This code may contain up to 48 bytes of UTF-8 character data.
6. A contact cannot be deleted if one or more domains are associated with it.
7. Only the sponsoring registrar of the contact may submit 〈update〉 or 〈delete〉 commands for the object.

25.4. EPP Extensions
CentralNic supports the following EPP extensions. CentralNicʹs implementations fully comply with the required specifications.

25.4.1. Registry Grace Period Mapping
Various grace periods and hold periods are supported by the Registry Grace Period mapping, as defined in RFC 3915. This is described further in response to question #27.

25.4.2. DNSSEC Security Extensions Mapping
Registrars may submit Delegation Signer (DS) record information for domains under their sponsorship. This permits the establishment of a secure chain-of-trust for DNSSEC validation.
CentralNic supports the specification defined in RFC 5910. This supports two interfaces: the DS Data Interface and Key Data Interface. CentralNic supports the former interface (DS Data), where registrars submit the keytag, algorithm, digest type and digest for DS records as XML elements, rather than as key data. Key data is stored if provided as a child element of the 〈secDNS:dsData〉 element. The maxSigLife element is optional in the specification and is not currently supported.

25.4.3. Launch Phase Extension
CentralNic has assisted development of a standard EPP extension for registry ʺlaunch phasesʺ (i.e. Sunrise and Landrush periods), during which the steady-state mode of ʺfirst-come, first-servedʺ operation does not apply. This extension permits registrars to submit requests for domains with claimed rights such as a registered trademark. The extension is currently described in an Internet-Draft (see http:⁄⁄tools.ietf.org⁄html⁄draft-tan-epp-launchphase-00). It is hoped that this draft will eventually be published as an RFC which can be implemented by other registries and registrars.

CentralNicʹs system implements this extension and will support the most recent version of the draft during the initial launch of the TLD. Once the TLD enters General Availability, this extension will no longer be available for use by registrars. Example frames describing the use of this extension are included in Appendix 25.2. As of writing, the current draft does not include a full schema definition, but a schema from a previous version has been included in Appendix 25.3. When the Draft is updated to include a schema, it will be based on this version.

25.5. Registrar Credentials and Access Control
Registrars are issued with a username (their registrar ID) and a password. This password cannot be used to access any other service and only this password can be used to access the EPP system. Registrar officers with the ʺManagementʺ access level can change their EPP password via the Registrar Console.
RFC 5730 requires ʺmutual, strong client-server authenticationʺ. CentralNic requires that all registrars connect using an SSL certificate. This certificate may be obtained from a recognized certificate authority, or it may be a self-signed certificate registered with CentralNic via the Registrar Console. Registrar officers with the ʺManagementʺ access level can upload SSL certificates for their account.

25.6. Session Limits and Transaction Volumes
There are no limits on the number of active sessions a registrar can maintain with the server. Similarly, there are no limits on the volume of transactions a registrar may send. However the system is fully capable of imposing connection limits and this measure may be used in future to ensure equal access amongst registrars.

25.7. Transaction Logging and Reporting
All ʺtransformʺ commands are logged. Transform commands are: 〈create〉, 〈renew〉, 〈update〉, 〈delete〉 and 〈transfer〉. The system logs the time and date when the command was received, the registrar which submitted it, the request and response frames, the result code and message. All commands, whether successful or not, are logged.

The transaction log is stored in the primary registry database. Registrars have access to the log for their account via the Registrar Console. The log viewer permits filtering by command, object type, object ID (domain, host name, contact ID), result code and timestamp.
Query commands (〈check〉, 〈info〉, 〈poll op=ʺreqʺ〉) and session commands (〈login〉, 〈logout〉 and 〈hello〉) are not logged due to the large volume of such queries (particularly 〈check〉 queries). The EPP system uses counters for these commands to facilitate generation of monthly reports.

25.8. EPP Message Queue
The EPP protocol provides a message queue to provide registrars with notifications for out-of-band events. CentralNic currently supports the following EPP message notifications:
• Approved inbound transfer.
• Rejected inbound transfer.
• New outbound transfer.
• Cancelled outbound transfer.
• Approved or rejected domain registration request (where TLD policy requires out-of-band approval of 〈domain:create〉 requests).

25.9. Registrar Support, Software Toolkit
CentralNic has supported EPP for many years. CentralNic has released a number of open source client libraries for several popular programming languages. These are used by registrars and registries around the world. CentralNic maintains the following open source EPP libraries:
• Net::EPP, a general purpose EPP library for Perl. See http:⁄⁄code.google.com⁄p⁄perl-net-epp⁄
• Preppi, a graphical EPP client written in Perl. See https:⁄⁄www.centralnic.com⁄company⁄labs⁄preppi
• Net_EPP, a PHP client class for EPP. See https:⁄⁄github.com⁄centralnic⁄php-epp
• Simpleepp, a Python client class for EPP. See https:⁄⁄bitbucket.org⁄milosn⁄simpleepp
• tx-epp-proxy, a EPP reverse proxy for shared-nothing client architectures written in Python. See https:⁄⁄bitbucket.org⁄milosn⁄tx-epp-proxy
These libraries are available for anyone to use, at no cost. CentralNic develops these libraries, and accepts submissions and bug reports from users around the world.

25.10. Quality Assurance, RFC Compliance
To ensure that its EPP system fully complies with the relevant specifications documents, CentralNic has implemented the following:

25.10.1. Schema Validation
The EPP system automatically validates all response frames against the XSD schema definitions provided in the RFCs. Should a non-validating response be sent to a registrar, an alert is raised with the NOC to be investigated and corrected. By default, this feature is disabled in the production environment but it is enabled in all other environments (as described below).

25.10.2. Multi-stage Deployment and Testing
EPP system code is developed, tested and deployed in a multi-stage environment:
1. Developers maintain their own development environment in which new code is written and changes are prepared. Development environments are configured with the highest level of debugging and strictness to provide early detection of faults.
2. All changes to the EPP system are subjected to peer review: other developers in the team must review, test and sign off the changes before being committed (or, if developed on a branch, being merged into the stable branch).
3. Changes to EPP system code are then deployed in the OT&E environment. Registrars continually test this system as part of their own QA processes, and this additional phase provides an additional level of quality assurance.

25.10.3. Registrar Feedback
Registrars are provided with an easy way to report issues with the EPP system, and many perform schema validation on the responses they receive. When issues are detected by registrars, they are encouraged to submit bug reports so that developers can rectify the issues.

25.11. EPP System Resourcing
As can be seen in the Resourcing Matrix found in Appendix 23.2, CentralNic will maintain a team of full-time developers and engineers which will contribute to the development and maintenance of this aspect of the registry system. These developers and engineers will not work on specific subsystems full-time, but a certain percentage of their time will be dedicated to each area. The total HR resource dedicated to this area is equivalent to more than one full-time person.
CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of the William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.

Whois is one of the oldest Internet protocols still in use. It allows interested persons to retrieve information relating to Internet resources (domain names and IP addresses). Whois services are operated by the registries of these resources, namely TLD registries and RIRs.
Whois is described by RFC 3912, which serves as a description of existing systems rather than requiring specific behaviors from clients and servers. The protocol is a query-response protocol, in which both the query and the response are opaque to the protocol, and their meanings are known only the server and to the human user who submits a query. Whois has a number of limitations, but remains ubiquitous as a means for obtaining information about name and number resources.

26.1. Compliance
The Whois service for the TLD will comply with RFC3912 and Specifications 4 and 10 of the New gTLD Registry Agreement. The service will be provided to the general public at no cost. If ICANN specify alternative formats and protocols (such as WEIRDS) then CentralNic will implement these as soon as reasonably practicable.
CentralNic will monitor its Whois system to confirm compliance. Monitoring stations will check the behavior and response of the Whois service to ensure the correctness of Whois records. CentralNic will maintain a public Whois contact to which bug reports and other questions about the Whois service can be directed.

26.2. Domain Name
By default, any query is assumed to be a domain name unless a keyword is prepended to the query. If the domain exists, then registration is returned, including the following fields:
• Domain ROID
• Domain Name
• Domain U-label (if IDN)
• Creation Date
• Last Updated
• Expiration Date
• EPP status codes
• Registrant Contact Information
• Administrative Contact Information
• Technical Contact Information
• Billing Contact Information (if any)
• Sponsoring Registrar ID
• Sponsoring Registrar Contact Information
• DNS servers (if any)
• DNSSEC records (if any)

An example of a domain whois response is included in Appendix 26.1. The Domain ROID is the Repository Object Identifier as described in RFC 5730, §2.8. The ROID field corresponds to the 〈domain:roid〉 element of EPP 〈info〉 responses.

A domain may be associated with one or more status codes. These are represented in Whois responses as phrases rather than EPP mnemonics. A domain may have any of the following status codes:
• PENDING CREATE - a 〈domain:create〉 command has been received through the SRS, but the registration has not yet been finalized as an out-of-band review process has not yet been completed.
• ADD PERIOD - the domain is in the Add Grace Period
• CLIENT HOLD - the registrar has added the clientHold status
• DELETE PROHIBITED - this may be present if the domain has either clientDeleteProhibited or serverDeleteProhibited (or both)
• INACTIVE - the domain has no DNS servers
• PENDING DELETE - the domain has left the Redemption Grace Period and is scheduled for deletion
• PENDING DELETE RESTORABLE - the domain is in the Redemption Grace Period
• PENDING RESTORE - a restore request has been received, but the Restore Report has not been received
• PENDING TRANSFER - there is an active inter-registrar transfer for the domain
• RENEW PERIOD - the domain is either in the Renew Grace Period or the Auto-Renew Grace Period
• RENEW PROHIBITED - this may be present if the domain has either clientRenewProhibited or serverRenewProhibited (or both)
• SERVER HOLD - the registry has added the serverHold status
• TRANSFER PERIOD - the domain is in the Transfer Grace Period
• TRANSFER PROHIBITED - this may be present if the domain has either clientTransferProhibited or serverTransferProhibited (or both)
• UPDATE PROHIBITED - this may be present if the domain has either clientUpdateProhibited or serverUpdateProhibited (or both)
• OK - present if none of the above apply.

The Registrant, Administrative, Technical and Billing Contact sections of the Whois record display the contact information for the contact objects that are associated with the domain. The information displayed replicates the information showed for a contact query (see below). The server shows similar information for the sponsoring registrar.
Domains may have 0-13 DNS servers. If a domain name has no DNS servers, then the ʺINACTIVEʺ status code appears in the Status section. If the registrant provided DS records for their DNSSEC-signed domain, then these are included. For each DS record, then the key tag, algorithm, digest type and digest are displayed.

26.3. Contact
Users can query for information about a contact by submitting a query of the form ʺcontact [ID]ʺ, where ʺ[ID]ʺ is the contact ID equivalent to the 〈contact:id〉 element in EPP 〈info〉 responses. This is also the ID used when referring to contacts in domain responses.
The following information is included in contact records:
• Contact ID
• Sponsoring Registrar
• Creation Date
• Last Updated Date
• EPP Status Codes
• Contact Name
• Organization
• Street Address (1-3 fields)
• City
• State⁄Province
• Postcode
• Country Code (2 character ISO-3166 code)
• Phone number (e164a format)
• Fax number (e164a format)
• Email address

An example of a contact object whois response is included in Appendix 26.2. A contact object may be associated with one or more status codes. These are represented in Whois responses as phrases rather than EPP code mnemonics. A contact object may have any of the following status codes:
• DELETE PROHIBITED - present if the contact object has either clientDeleteProhibited or serverDeleteProhibited (or both)
• TRANSFER PROHIBITED - present if the contact object has either clientTransferProhibited or serverTransferProhibited (or both)
• UPDATE PROHIBITED - present if the contact object has either clientUpdateProhibited or serverUpdateProhibited (or both)
• PENDING TRANSFER - there is an active inter-registrar transfer for the contact object
• LINKED - the contact object is associated with one or more domain names. A LINKED contact object automatically has the DELETE PROHIBITED status

26.4. Host Objects
Users can query for information about a host object by submitting a query of the form ʺnameserver [HOST]ʺ. The following information is included in host records:
• Server Name
• IPv4 address (if any)
• IPv6 address (if any)
• EPP status codes
• Sponsoring Registrar
• Creation Date
• Referral URL (if any)

An example of a host whois response is included in Appendix 26.3. A host object may have an IPv4 or IPv6 address if the host is ʺin-bailiwickʺ, i.e. subordinate to a domain name within a TLD operated by the registry. IP address information is not shown for ʺout-of-bailiwickʺ hosts.

Host objects may only have two status codes:
• INACTIVE - the host is not associated with any domain names
• LINKED - the host is associated with one or more domain names

The Referral URL is the website of the Sponsoring Registrar for this host. If the host is subordinate to a domain name in the TLD, this will be the sponsoring registrar of the parent name. If the host is out-of-bailiwick, then the sponsoring registrar is the registrar who issued the original 〈create〉 request.

26.5. Character Encoding
Responses are encoded as UTF-8. Queries are assumed to be encoded in UTF-8.

26.6. IDN Support
The Whois service supports Internationalized Domain Names. Users may submit queries for IDN domains using either the U-label or the A-label.

26.7. Bulk Access
CentralNic will provide up-to-date registration data to ICANN on a weekly basis (the day to be designated by ICANN). CentralNic will provide the following data for all registered domain names: domain name, repository object id (roid), registrar id (IANA ID), statuses, last updated date, creation date, expiration date, and name server names. For sponsoring registrars it will provide: registrar name, registrar repository object id (roid), hostname of registrar Whois server, and URL of registrar. Data will be provided in the format specified in Specification 2 for Data Escrow (including encryption, signing, etc.) but including only the fields mentioned in the above.

At ICANNʹs request, CentralNic will provide ICANN with up-to-date data for the domain names of de-accredited registrar to facilitate a bulk transfer. The data will be provided in the format specified in Specification 2 for Data Escrow. The file will only contain data related to the domain names of the losing registrar. CentralNic will provide the data within 2 business days.

26.8. Load Projections
As described in response to question #31, CentralNicʹs existing Whois system receives an average of 0.36 queries per day for each domain name in the registry, including misses for non-existent objects as well as hits.

The number of daily queries per domain for each existing gTLD was calculated using figures for the month of November 2011 published by ICANN. This analysis may be found in Appendix 26.6. It shows little correlation between the number of domains in the TLD and the number of queries that each domain receives. Smaller gTLDs such as .aero and .museum receive more queries per domain than larger gTLDs, but .jobs (which is much larger than either .aero or .museum) received more queries per domain than either. It should be noted that the high volumes observed for .XXX are very likely due to activities surrounding the Landrush and initial launch of that TLD.

CentralNic believes that the query rate observed for its own registry system is mainly affected by its efforts to deter abuse, and outreach to registrars, who often use whois to perform availability checks, to encourage them to EPP instead. CentralNic believes this query rate will also apply for the TLD. A projection of query load for the Whois system for the first 24 months of operation can be found in Appendix 26.4. This model also includes data transit rates and bandwidth projections for the same period. As can be seen, the data and bandwidth requirements are relatively small compared to those for the Shared Registry System and authoritative DNS.

26.9. Technical Implementation
A diagram describing the infrastructure supporting the Whois service may be found in Figure 26.1. During normal operations, the Whois service is operated at the primary operations centre in London. During failover conditions, it is operated at the Disaster Recovery site in the Isle of Man (see response to question #34).

Queries pass through the firewalls to one of two front-end load balancers. Round-robin DNS distributes queries between the devices. Load balancers are configured in High Availability mode so that if one a server fails, the other will resume service on its IP address until the server can be restored. Queries are distributed to backend application servers via weighted least connections algorithm.

26.9.1. Application Server Architecture
Application servers are built on commodity hardware running CentOS. The service is provided using the mod_whois Apache module (see http:⁄⁄modwhois.sf.net⁄) which causes Apache to listen on port 43 and accept queries, which are then handled using a PHP script, which generates and returns the response.

26.9.2. Caching
Application servers use caching to reduce database load. Subsequent identical queries are returned a cached record until the cache expires, after which a new record is generated. Records are currently cached for 600 seconds (ten minutes), so if a domain is updated immediately after its Whois record has been cached, the updated record will be visible after ten minutes. This compares favorably to the 60 minute requirement in the gTLD Service Level Agreement. Records are cached in a shared Memached server. Memcached is a high-performance caching server used by some of the largest sites in the world, including Wikipedia, Flickr, Wordpress.com and Craigslist.

26.9.2. Database
The Whois service draws data directly from the primary database. The query volume required to sustain the Whois service is comparable to that of a modest web application such as a small e-commerce site, and as a result a dedicated database for the Whois system is not required. As can be seen in Figure 26.1, a separate logging database is used to aggregate log data for use with the rate limiting system.

26.10. Web based Whois Service
CentralNic provides a web interface to the Whois service on its website. In addition, WME will provide a similar service on the TLD registry website. The web Whois acts as a proxy to the port 43 Whois service: users enter a query into a form, and a server-side process submits the query to the Whois server, and displays the response. This service will not be subjected to the rate limiting described above, but users will be required to complete a CAPTCHA to prevent high-volume automated access.

26.11. Searchable Whois Service
WME will provide a Searchable Whois Service (SWS). This service will be made available on the TLD website. The SWS provides third parties with a search interface that allows queries for partial matches against a number of domain name properties, including:
• Domain name (partial match)
• Registrant name, organization, address, email
• Administrative, technical and billing contact information
• Nameservers
• Nameserver IPv4⁄IPv6 address

Access to the SWS is restricted. Users must submit an account request via the website, and agree to the terms and conditions which govern their access to the system.

These terms are included as Appendix 26.5. Once their request has been reviewed and approved, they are issued with credentials which permit them to login to the SWS.

To prevent abuse of the SWS, users may only make fifty queries per day initially. This limit can be increased upon request and demonstration of legitimate need.

26.12. Anti-Abuse Mechanisms
CentralNic has implemented measures to mitigate the threat of abuse of the Whois service. The primary threat to the Whois service are so-called ʺdictionaryʺ attacks, where an attacker attempts to enumerate the database by flooding the server with queries for domains taken from a precompiled list: as zone files are easy to obtain, this presents a threat to the privacy of contact information in the registry database. The information harvested can be used to compile email databases for spamming, or to send domain renewal scam letters, for example.

The Whois service implements rate-limiting to impede dictionary attacks. For each query, a counter associated with the client IP address is incremented. For subsequent queries, this counter determines the number of queries received within the previous hour. If the number of queries exceeds a pre-set maximum (currently 240 queries per hour), then the server returns an error, warning the user that they have exceeded the permitted query rate. If the user stops sending queries, then eventually the query rate will drop below the limit, and subsequent queries will be permitted. If the user continues to send queries, and the query rate exceeds the limit by a further 25% (300 queries per hour), then the IP address is permanently blocked. For queries over IPv6 (where an attacker might have access to billions of IP addresses), the enclosing ⁄48 will be blocked.
Experience indicates that is an effective mechanism for preventing abuse of the Whois. The rate limit has been tuned to ensure that legitimate uses of the Whois are allowed, but abusive use of the whois is restricted to levels which are unappealing for attackers.

CentralNic keeps a ʺwhite listʺ of IP addresses used by legitimate users of the Whois service, including law enforcement agencies and other research and anti-abuse entities. Registrar access lists are also incorporated into the white list, and IP addresses registered on ICANNʹs RADAR system will also be included. Queries from IP addresses that appear on the white list are not rate-limited. Interested parties can request addition to the white list by contacting CentralNicʹs public customer service team.
The web-based Whois does not implement rate-limiting, but users of this service must complete a CAPTCHA to access Whois records.

26.12.1. Denial-of-Service attacks
The rate-limiting system in place provides protection against DoS and DDoS attacks, as any host that attempts to flood the Whois service with queries will be quickly blocked. However, a DDoS attack could still saturate upstream links requiring filtering at the edges of CentralNicʹs network, as well as their upstream providers. Continuous surveillance and monitoring of the Whois system (see response to question #42) proactively detects these threats. As the Whois service directly queries the primary SRS database, CentralNic rate-limits on the database backend to prevent an attack against the Whois service from disrupting the SRS.

26.13. Monitoring and Logging
Remote monitoring is used to verify the availability of the service and to record the round-trip times for different queries (warm hit, warm miss). Local monitoring records query volumes.

26.14. Resourcing
As can be seen in the Resourcing Matrix found in Appendix 23.2, CentralNic will maintain a team of full-time developers and engineers which will contribute to the development and maintenance of this aspect of the registry system. These developers and engineers will not work on specific subsystems full-time, but a certain percentage of their time will be dedicated to each area. The total HR resource dedicated to this area is equivalent to almost one full-time person (83%.
CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.
The lifecycle of a domain in the registry is described in Figure 27.1, and closely follows that of domain names in existing gTLD registries. The lifecycle is described below.

27.1. Available
The domain is not registered. No delegation (or any other records) exist in the DNS, and the whois system will return a ʺNOT FOUNDʺ response to queries. An EPP 〈check〉 command will return an ʺavailʺ status of 1.

27.2. Registered
A registrar submits an EPP 〈create〉 command or registers the domain name via the Registrar Console. The registration fee is deducted from the registrarʹs balance. The initial registration period may be any whole number of years between one (1) and ten (10).
For five (5) calendar days after the registration of the domain, the registrar can delete the domain and receive a credit for the registration fee (subject to the Add Grace Period Limits Policy).

While the domain is registered, it is delegated to the specified name servers and will resolve normally. During this time, the registrar may update the domain nameʹs DNS settings, lock statuses and contact associations, and may extend the registration period (subject to a maximum of ten (10) years) by submitting a 〈renew〉 EPP command or using the Registrar Console.

The domain may also be transferred to a different sponsoring registrar (except during the initial 60 days of registration or following a successful transfer). Upon such transfer the domain name is automatically renewed for one year.

27.3. Expired
When the expiry date is reached, the domain name is automatically renewed (if requested by the registrant) for a period of one year, and the renewal fee is deducted from the registrarʹs account.
For forty-five (45) days after the auto-renewal (Auto-Renew Grace Period), the registrar can upon termination of the registration agreement by the registrant, delete the domain and receive a credit for the renewal fee.

27.4. Redemption Grace Period
Should the registrar delete the domain, the domain enters the Redemption Grace Period. During this period, the domain name will no longer resolve as all delegation information is removed from the TLD zone.

For the first thirty (30) days after receipt of the delete request, the domain is in the ʺPending Delete Restorableʺ state. During this time, the registrar may submit an RGP restore request via EPP or the Registrar Console. The domain is then placed into the ʺPending Restoreʺ state.
The registrar must then submit an RGP Restore Report detailing the reason why the restore request has been submitted. If the Restore Report is received within five (5) calendar days of the original restore request, then the domain is restored. However, if the Restore Report is not received within this period, then the domain falls back into the ʺPending Delete Restorableʺ state.

27.5. Redemption Period State Diagram
Figure 27.2 describes the state diagram for domain names in the Redemption Grace Period. This diagram is taken from RFC 3915.

27.6. Pending Delete
Forty (40) days after the receipt of the delete request, the domain leaves the ʺPending Delete Restorableʺ and enters the ʺPending Deleteʺ status. The registrar cannot submit a Restore Request during this period.

27.7. Released
Five (5) days after the domain enters the ʺPending Deleteʺ status the domain name is purged from the database and is once again available for registration.

27.8. Other Grace Periods
The registry also implements the following grace periods. In general, these grace periods allow registrars to delete domain names following billable transactions and receive a refund.

27.8.1. Add Grace Period
As described above, the Add Grace Period (AGP) is the five (5) calendar days following the initial registration of the domain.

27.8.2. Auto-renew Grace Period
As described above, the Auto-renew Grace Period is the forty five (45) calendar days following the auto-renewal of the domain.

27.8.3. Renew Grace Period
The Renew Grace Period is the five (5) calendar days following the renewal of the domain via an EPP 〈renew〉 command, or via the Registrar Console.

27.8.4. Transfer Grace Period
The Transfer Grace Period is the five (5) calendar days following the successful completion of an inter-registrar transfer.

27.9. Hold Periods
The registry implements the following hold periods:

27.9.1. Registration Hold Period
The Registration Hold Period forbids inter-registrar transfers of domain names within sixty (60) days of initial registration.

27.9.2. Transfer Hold Period
The Transfer Hold Period forbids transfers of domain names within sixty (60) days of a previous inter-registrar transfer. This Hold Period does not affect disputed transfers that are undone by the registry following the outcome of a Transfer Dispute Resolution process.

27.10. Lock Statuses
The registry system permits the following lock statuses for domain names:

27.10.1. clientHold
This status may be set by registrars using an EPP 〈update〉 command, or via the Registrar Console. Domains with this status are removed from the DNS and will not resolve.

27.10.2. clientDeleteProhibited
This status may be set by registrars using an EPP 〈update〉 command, or via the Registrar Console. When set, all attempts by the registrar to delete the domain using an EPP 〈delete〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation). Registrars must remove the code using an EPP 〈update〉 command before they can delete the domain.

27.10.3. clientRenewProhibited
This status may be set by registrars using an EPP 〈update〉 command, or via the Registrar Console. When set, all attempts by the registrar to renew the domain using an EPP 〈renew〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation). Registrars must remove the code using an EPP 〈update〉 command before they can renew the domain.

27.10.4. clientUpdateProhibited
This status may be set by registrars using an EPP 〈update〉 command, or via the Registrar Console. When set, all attempts by the registrar to update the domain using an EPP 〈update〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation), unless the 〈update〉 request frame includes a 〈rem〉 element to remove this status. Once the status has been removed, subsequent 〈update〉 commands will succeed.

27.10.5. clientTransferProhibited
This status may be set by registrars using an EPP 〈update〉 command, or via the Registrar Console. When set, all attempts by other registrars to submit a transfer request for the domain using an EPP 〈transfer〉 command, or via the Registrar Console, will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation). The sponsoring registrar must remove this status before any other registrar can submit a transfer request.

27.10.6. serverHold
This status is set by the registry in accordance with policy. It cannot be removed by registrars. Domains with this status are removed from the DNS and will not resolve.

27.10.7. serverDeleteProhibited
This status is set by the registry in accordance with policy. It cannot be removed by registrars. When set, all attempts by the registrar to delete the domain using an EPP 〈delete〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation).

27.10.8. serverUpdateProhibited
This status is set by the registry in accordance with policy. It cannot be removed by registrars. When set, all attempts by the registrar to update the domain using an EPP 〈update〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation).

27.10.9. serverRenewProhibited
This status is set by the registry in accordance with policy. It cannot be removed by registrars. When set, all attempts by the registrar to renew the domain using an EPP 〈renew〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation).

27.10.10. serverTransferProhibited
This status is set by the registry in accordance with policy. It cannot be removed by registrars. When set, all attempts by the registrar to transfer the domain using an EPP 〈transfer〉 command will be refused with EPP response code 2304 (Status Prohibits Operation).

27.11. Lifecycle Processing
Domain names move through the lifecycle in one of two ways: in real-time as a result of registrar activity, or during daily billing runs.
Billing runs take place once per day. The billing run performs the following batch jobs:
• Auto-renewal of expired domains.
• Processing of registration and renewal fees for domains that move outside their grace periods.
• Processing of domains in the RGP state (from restorable to not restorable, checking for missing restore reports, etc.).
• Purging of domains scheduled for deletion.
The billing runs also perform registrar account management functions such as generation of invoices, sending balance warnings, and generation of internal reports.

27.12. Inter-Registrar Transfer Period
The Inter-Registrar Transfer Process follows the corresponding ICANN consensus policy. When a transfer request is received, the action date of the transfer is set to five (5) calendar days from the moment of the original request. Successful transfers are approved at the end of this period.

27.13. pendingCreate Status
The Registry system supports the ʺpendingCreateʺ status for domain names, as described in RFC 5731, §3.3. Domains in this state are fully registered in the database (subsequent 〈create〉 commands would fail with an Object Exists error) but are not present in the DNS.

This status is used when a particular TLD implements a policy whereby registration requests are verified by a third party such as a Sponsoring Organization or Validation Agent. Following out-of-band review of the request, the registration may be approved or denied.

If a request is denied, then the domain is immediately purged from the registry system, and the registrar notified via email and the EPP message queue. The registrar also receives a credit for the registration fee. If approved, then the pendingCreate status is removed from the domain which begins to resolve.

27.14. Resourcing
The domain registration lifecycle is managed through automated backend processes that generally require no human intervention, and real-time business logic implemented in Shared Registry System application code. Operations personnel will be responsible for maintaining and developing the computing infrastructure which supports the lifecycle processing systems. Backend systems are hosted on a flexible virtual infrastructure hosted at the primary operations centre at the Goswell Road Data Centre in London.

The domain registration lifecycle does have customer and registrar support requirements, so a proportion of the time of the Operations Manager, Support Manager and Support Agent has been dedicated to this area. This time primarily relates to dealing with questions and comments from registrars and registrants about the status of their domain names.

As can be seen in the Resourcing Matrix found in Appendix 23.2, CentralNic will maintain a team of full-time developers and engineers which will contribute to the development and maintenance of this aspect of the registry system. These developers and engineers will not work on specific subsystems full-time, but a certain percentage of their time will be dedicated to each area. The total HR resource dedicated to this area is equivalent to 30% of a full time person. Because of the maturity and stability of this system (which has been in use for more than 16 years), only 5% of time of a technical developer has been allocated to this area.
CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.
Top Level Domain registries stand in a unique position within the global DNS infrastructure.

TLD registries collect registrants’ registration data and so often “know” the entity responsible for a particular domain name. TLD registries record associations between domain names, registrars and registrants and therefore are in the core of the control chain for every domain name in the TLD. Registries also directly control the delegation records and therefore have the power to enable or disable a particular domain name in the DNS.

This unique position gives power and calls for responsibility. WME as a future TLD registry recognizes its important role in maintaining law and order and is committed to acting in the best interests of the public. In addition to the below described abuse prevention and mitigation methods it should be noted that .WME is being managed as a single-registrant registry where only the applicant, William Morris Endeavor (WME) can make domain name registrations. Such are further conducted in strict compliance with the established internal process for (low volume) registrations conducted by and for use by WME (see response to question #18).
In the following we provide a description of the principles and procedures we will apply to mitigate abusive conduct in .WME.

28.1. Single Abuse Point of Contact

To streamline the information flow and to facilitate ease of communication with the public, WME will dedicate a single abuse point of contact responsible for addressing matters requiring expedited attention and providing a timely response to abuse complaints concerning all names registered in the TLD. The contact information will consist of at least an email address and a telephone number. This point of contact will be prominently published on the registry website by the commencement of the Sunrise period.
WME will ensure that:
• The e-mail account is continuously monitored and all communication securely stored.
• The telephone number is either answered by a live person or diverted to a monitored voicemail account.
• Abuse contact information will be kept current and will be updated should it ever change in a timely manner.
Messages received through the published abuse point of contact will be processed via the same procedure and within the same timeframe as the signals coming from the monitoring systems. Each message, both via email and phone channels, triggers the creation of a support ticket in a dedicated queue and procedures for ticket escalation exist. Messages originating from law enforcement authorities are by default assigned an escalated level. For critical tickets personnel is available 24x7 to react accordingly.
WME and CentralNic commit to responding to all abuse complaints within 24 hours of receipt (on a 24x7 basis). During the time periods when its global offices are open (typically 8am-6pm in London, Los Angeles and Dubai) response times are expected to be substantially faster, at around 2-3 hours.

28.2. Abuse Policy

WME is prepared to deal with situations where registry intervention may be required in order to stop illegal activity, prevent abusive conduct or to enforce the law.
WME will adopt a comprehensive Anti-Abuse Policy that will establish what constitutes acceptable use of the domain and will contain a description of procedures registry that will apply to enforce the Policy.

An enforcement action may be triggered by a variety of events including complaints from the public, registrars or ICANN, decisions of a competent dispute resolution provider, outreach from a governmental agency or findings produced by internal investigation or monitoring processes. While the process or enforcement action also will be facilitated in a request from an authorized dispute resolution provider it is clear that the Anti-Abuse Policy is not a replacement for the UDRP or URS. Any disputes under the UDRP or URS will be managed under the processes associated therein.
If abusive behavior in a TLD is encountered, the reports of such behavior and the evidence available will be analyzed by the Registry. If the Registry, in its sole discretion, concludes that a Domain Name Holder has indeed violated a TLD Policy, the registrant will be given a notice and opportunity to correct the breach.
Typically the enforcements will go through the associated registrar. Registrars have more data available about registrants and so they will typically be in a better position to evaluate abuse complaints. However, if the registrar does not take action within a reasonable time period then the registry will take action directly. The registry will always reserves the right to act (lock or hold the name) directly and immediately without pre-notice to the registrar should the situation be such that the potential harm towards Internet Users is imminent or of a significant magnitude.

In extreme cases where a domain is involved in malicious or illegal activity there are provisions for rapid takedown of the domain name in question.

Repeated violations of the Anti-Abuse Policy will result in active monitoring and WME reserves the right to deny registrations of domains under .WME to repeat offenders.
The following policy is a current version that is being used by existing gTLD registries. WME and CentralNic will from time to time review and revise the policy as it becomes necessary to keep the TLD zone secure.

.WME Anti-Abuse Policy
The following Anti-Abuse Policy will be effective upon .WME launch. Malicious use of domain names will not be tolerated. The nature of such abuses creates security and stability issues for the registry, registrars, and registrants, as well as for users of the Internet in general. The WME definition of abusive use of a domain includes, without limitation, the following:
• Illegal or fraudulent actions;
• Spam: The use of electronic messaging systems to send unsolicited bulk messages. The term applies to email spam and similar abuses such as instant messaging spam, mobile messaging spam, and the spamming of web sites and Internet forums;
• Phishing: The use of counterfeit web pages that are designed to trick recipients into divulging sensitive data such as personally identifying information, usernames, passwords, or financial data;
• Pharming: The redirecting of unknowing users to fraudulent sites or services, typically through, but not limited to, DNS hijacking or poisoning;
• Willful distribution of malware: The dissemination of software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the ownerʹs informed consent. Examples include, without limitation, computer viruses, worms, keyloggers, and Trojan horses.
• Malicious fast-flux hosting: Use of fast-flux techniques with a botnet to disguise the location of web sites or other Internet services, or to avoid detection and mitigation efforts, or to host illegal activities.
• Botnet command and control: Services run on a domain name that are used to control a collection of compromised computers or ʺzombies,ʺ or to direct distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS attacks);
• Unauthorized access to information systems: Illegally accessing computers, accounts, or networks belonging to another party, or attempting to penetrate security measures of another individualʹs system (often known as ʺhackingʺ). Also, any activity that might be used as a precursor to an attempted system penetration (e.g., port scan, stealth scan, or other information gathering activity).

The WME Anti-Abuse Policy will be incorporated into the Registry-Registrar agreements and Registrars will be required to pass through the requirements to comply with the policy to the registrants.

WME will take reasonable steps to investigate and respond to any reports of illegal activity in connection with the use of the TLD and will cooperate with the competent governmental agencies in such investigations.

WME will utilize the expert services of its registry services provider CentralNic to implement and enforce the .WME Anti-Abuse Policy. CentralNic has dedicated and scalable resources for this function, described briefly as follows; in addition WME will pursue working with other gTLD operators to facilitate informational sharing of abuse activities, mechanisms and behavior within .WME to ensure coordinated mitigation efforts across TLDs.

CentralNic has long experience in the domain registry business, and is an industry leader with respect to its anti-abuse policies. CentralNic has a dedicated Dispute Resolution Policy in place with WIPO, found at WIPO’s website: http:⁄⁄www.wipo.int⁄amc⁄en⁄domains⁄gtld⁄cnic⁄index.html. CentralNic has trained personnel who handle interaction with WIPO, to ensure that panelists’ decisions are carried out expeditiously as required by the DRP.
CentralNic also enforces a Policy on Phishing and Fraud, found at its dedicated Phishing & Abuse page at the following website: https:⁄⁄www.centralnic.com⁄support⁄abuse.

WME will keep records and statistics regarding abuse and abuse reports, including:
• Number of abuse reports received by the registry’s abuse point of contact;
• Number of cases and domains referred to registrars for resolution;
• Number of cases and domains where the registry took direct action;
• Resolution times;
• Number of domains in the TLD that have been blacklisted by major anti-spam blocklist providers, and;
• Phishing site uptimes in the TLD.

28.3. Orphan Glue
CentralNicʹs registry system includes effective measures to prevent the abuse of orphan glue records.
Firstly, the Shared Registry System will reject any request to create host object that is the child of a non-existent domain name. That is, if EXAMPLE.WME does not exist, then NS0.EXAMPLE.WME cannot be created. If the parent domain name does exist, then only the sponsoring registrar of that domain is permitted to create child host objects.
Glue records become orphan when the its parent name server is removed and the orphan glue is not removed for example in the situation where a domain is placed in a hold status meaning that the domain is removed from the zone and no longer will resolve. However, the child name server, i.e. orphan glue, is left in the zone if any innocent sites are using this name server. This is to avoid interruption to sites not related to the domain in question.
As such the CentralNicʹs registry system first checks if an orphan glue is used by other domains and if so then the orphan glue will not be deleted until no other domains are using the glue record. This is in corresponding with the ICANN SSAC paper SAC048.
However, in the situation where orphan glue is used maliciously it will be removed from the zone file.

28.4. Measures to Maintain Whois Accuracy
WME will operate a “thick” WHOIS system, in which all registrants’ contact information will be stored in a single database maintained by the registry. Accredited registrars will have the ability to change the records in that database through the Shared Registration System. The Registry-Registrar agreement requires registrars to ensure that the WHOIS data is accurate at the time of submission and also requires the information provided on the system to be updated in a timely manner in case of any changes.
Corresponding provisions also exist in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), para. 3.7.7.
In addition to the standard measures described above, the WME WHOIS system will feature extra levels of reliability with regards to Whois information.

28.4.1. Extra checks on WHOIS data
WME, through its Registry-Registrar agreements will require registrars to perform the following additional checks on the WHOIS data:
• Verify syntactic correctness of email addresses and phone numbers by validating them against the corresponding standards.
• Verify that the domain holder receives email at the addresses listed in WHOIS as registrant’s email address and administrative contact email address, by requiring them to click a unique web link that is sent to those addresses.

28.4.2. Random audits of WHOIS records by the Registry
WME will periodically (at least once every 12 months) perform a random check of WHOIS records in WME for prima facie evidence of fraudulent or inaccurate WHOIS information. For those suspicious records that may be found, WME will further require registrars to conduct a reasonable investigation and to respond with one of the three possible actions:
• Confirm that the information provided in WHOIS is accurate, or
• Correct the WHOIS information, or
• Delete the domain name(s).

The measures described above exceed the ICANN requirements and are adequate to improve accuracy of WHOIS information while maintaining low implementation cost for registrars and good user experience for registrants.

28.5. Resourcing
WME and CentralNic will provide abuse response on a 24x7 basis. The resourcing to fulfill this function will be provided by a combined team of support and operations personnel. The first response function will be provided by support agents during normal office hours, with this responsibility being passed to the Network Operations Centre (NOC) during 24x7 operations.

As can be seen in the Resourcing Matrix found in Appendix 23.2, CentralNic will maintain a team of full-time developers and engineers which will contribute to the development and maintenance of this aspect of the registry system. These developers and engineers will not work on specific subsystems full-time, but a certain percentage of their time will be dedicated to each area. The total HR resource dedicated to this area is equivalent to 75% of a full-time role.
CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

28.6. Periodic review of anti-abuse policies
WME acknowledges that new types of abusive behavior emerge in cyber space and is prepared to take steps to counter any new types of abuse. WME will periodically (once every 12 months or more frequently depending on the circumstances) together with CentralNic provide reports regarding the received abuse-related complaints. Such reports will contain categorization of the abusive behavior, actions taken and response time as relevant to the statistics listed above. WME will analyses the reports and will review its anti-abuse policies to continually improve the handling of abuse complaints.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.

WME recognizes providing appropriate mechanisms to protect legal rights of others as one of the core objectives of the Registry. WME will follow rules and policies developed by ICANN with regards to Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs). WME will fully comply with Specification 7 of the new gTLD registry agreement and will provide additional rights protection mechanisms over and above the ICANN requirements. Both standard and additional RPMs are described below.
In particular it should be noted that .WME is a single-registrant registry where only the applicant, William Morris Endeavor (WME) can make registrations for its own use. This will be done in strict compliance with all policies set forth by ICANN and the registration process identifying the WME eligibility requirements established in response to question #18, including requirement that the low volume of domains registered do not to infringe on rights of others. As a result the TLD is considered as secure as it possible can be in regards to right protection.

29.1. Sunrise Period
Prior to the open registration phase WME will offer a priority registration period for owners of trademarks and service marks. This period will last at least 30 days. Since .WME is operated as a single-registrant-registry with eligibility criteria set forth in response to question #18, and since WME does not anticipate making sunrise registrations, no such registrations are anticipated. However, WME will comply with ICANN requirements concerning sunrise period establishment and criteria as described further below.

Additionally WME will support Trademark Clearinghouse (TCH) as it is implemented by ICANN.

The flowchart of the Sunrise and eligibility validation process is available in Figure 24.4.

29.1.1. Sunrise Eligibility Requirements
Any entity that holds a trademark or service mark will be qualified to register a domain during the Sunrise period. As mentioned established eligibility requirements must also be fulfilled. Registrations obtained during the Sunrise Period will be subject to challenge as described below.

As a minimum, the Registry will recognize the requirements set forth in the 11 January 2012 ICANN Applicant Guidebook, Trademark Clearing House Specification, Section 7.2., or any subsequent versions thereto.

Full details of the Sunrise registration process will be finalized after the Trademark Clearinghouse service is implemented and full documentation, policies, terms and conditions are made available. For guidance, data items that will need to be provided by the qualifying applicant to apply for a WME Sunrise registration are listed below:
• name or description of the trademark
• registration number
• registration date
• country of registration
• capacity of the applicant
• reference to the Trademark Clearinghouse database record
• Representation that the information provided is true and correct

29.1.2. Sunrise Challenge Process
A process will be in place to allow third parties to dispute the registrant rights to own a domain name. WME will engage with a reputable adjudicator to manage the Sunrise challenge process. The adjudicator will charge a reasonable fee for Sunrise challenges.

The Sunrise Challenge rules will allow challenges based on at least the following four grounds. These may be adjusted to match the eligibility requirements in the Trademark Clearing House, if modified from its current form.
• At the time the challenged domain name was registered, the registrant did not hold a word mark registration of national effect (or regional effect) and for which proof of use was validated by the TCH; or
• The word mark had not been court-validated; or
• The word mark was no protected by statute or treaty and in effect on or prior to 26 June 2008; or
• The domain name was not identical to the mark on which the registrant based its Sunrise registration.

29.2. Trademark Claims Service
The Trademark Claims service will be launched by the registry as soon as it is required by ICANN, in its final specification thereof. WME will review the effect of the Trademark Claims service.

The essence of the Trademark Claims service is as follows: if a domain name registration is attempted for which there exists a matching record in the Trademark Clearinghouse database, then the prospective registrant will be presented with a notice that third party trademark rights exist for a matching designation and will be required to provide a statement that to the best of his or her knowledge, the registration and use of the requested domain name will not infringe on the rights of the trademark holders.
If the registrant chooses to proceed with the registration, the corresponding trademark holder(s) will be notified that such registration has taken place.
Operational rules of the Trademark Claims service are heavily dependent on the specific implementation of the Trademark Clearinghouse which is not yet available in writing. Therefore full details of the Trademark Claims service will be finalized after the TCH is implemented by ICANN and full documentation, policies, terms and conditions become available.

29.3. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy is an ICANN consensus policy for adjudication of disputes between domain name holders and owners of matching trademarks. Every registrant must agree to this mandatory administrative procedure in its Domain Registration Agreement with the registrar. Registrars have certain responsibilities to facilitate adjudication of UDRP disputes and to enforce the decisions of the arbitration panels.

.WME will comply with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy or with any successor thereof. The UDRP will be incorporated by reference into Registry-Registrar Agreements. Similarly, Registrars will be required to incorporate it into their Domain Registration agreements with the Registrants.

The UDRP process does not provide for any participation by the Registry and is fully borne by the Registrar, Registrant, Complainant and the Dispute Resolution Provider.

WME will collaborate with all relevant stakeholders to ensure UDRP decisions are implemented.

CentralNic has experience maintaining a dispute resolution policy similar to UDRP with WIPO which is available at http:⁄⁄www.wipo.int⁄amc⁄en⁄domains⁄gtld⁄cnic⁄index.html. CentralNic has dedicated personnel trained to manage the implementation of UDRP decisions made by all ICANN authorized dispute resolution providers.

29.4. Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)
The Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) described in the ICANN gTLD Applicant Guidebook is a new Rights Protection Mechanism for rapid takedown of domain names that by clear and convincing evidence infringe on legitimate trademark rights of third parties.
As opposed to the UDRP procedure, registries are required to participate in the URS procedure and enforcement of the URS decisions. WME will comply with the URS policy once and as it is implemented by ICANN.

The current URS procedure as described in the Applicant Guidebook is as follows: within 24 hours of receipt of the Notice of Complaint from a URS Provider, the Registry has to lock the domain, restricting all changes to the registration data, including transfer and deletion. The domain name will continue to resolve at this stage. The Registry will notify the URS Provider immediately upon locking the domain name.

If the URS Determination is in favor of Complainant, upon receipt of the Determination the Registry will suspend the domain name which is intended to remain suspended for the balance of the registration period and will not resolve to the original web site. Instead, the nameservers will be redirected to an informational web page provided by the URS Provider about the URS. The Whois record for the domain name will continue to display all of the information of the original Registrant except for the redirection of the nameservers. In addition, the Whois will reflect that the domain name will not be able to be transferred, deleted or modified for the life of the registration.

If the URS Determination is in favor of the Respondent, the Registry will remove the lock status from the domain name allowing the registrant to continue using it normally.
The URS compliance function will be performed by CentralNic and overseen by WME. Given CentralNic long-standing experience in dealing with trademark-related disputes in domain names, WME has no doubt that this function will be performed by CentralNic flawlessly.

29.5 Abusive use⁄takedown policies
Response to question #28 contains a detailed description of measures that WME will take to prevent and mitigate abusive registrations and the description of policies that WME will apply to handle complaints regarding abuse and take down abusive registrations. To summarize,
• WME will dedicate a single abuse point of contact. Correspondence and complaints coming through that point of contact will be continuously monitored and responded to within 24 hours
• WME will publish the Anti-Abuse Policy on its website; setting forth the procedures the Registry will apply in case of Anti-Abuse Policy violations; and also including its takedown procedures.
• WME will delete orphan glue records once the parent domain is deleted to prevent abuse of these orphan glue records
• WME will require registrars to perform extra checks on WHOIS data to improve its accuracy
• WME will perform random audits of WHOIS data and will flag suspicious registrations via registrars

29.6 Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure
WME reaffirms its intent to comply with the ICANN-mandated Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP).
WME believes that its choice of TLD string and the way the TLD is intended to be operated represents a good faith offering of Top Level Domain Registry service and does not infringe on any legitimate third party trademark rights.

WME also reaffirms its commitment to maintain .WME free of violations of third party trademark rights through second level domain registration and use. WME has all the required resources, policies and procedures in place to address any situations of abuse without the need to invoke the PDDRP procedure.

29.7. Resourcing
The Rights Protection Mechanisms described above include a combination of both technical and non-technical systems: for example, the Trademark Claims Service may (depending on the final specification published by ICANN) require development, maintenance and support of an EPP extension, as well as real-time integration with the TCH API, whereas the UDRP is a primarily manual process of managing and responding to UDRP dispute resolution providers and implementing their decisions in cases of disputes.

CentralNic operates a shared registry environment where multiple registry zones (such as CentralNicʹs domains, the .LA ccTLD, this TLD and other gTLDs) share a common infrastructure and resources. Since the TLD will be operated in a similar manner to these other registries, and on the same infrastructure, then the TLD will benefit from an economy of scale with regards to access to CentralNicʹs resources.

Except where specified this answer refers to the operations of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC (WME)ʹs outsourced Registry Service Provider, CentralNic.

30(a).1. Introduction
CentralNicʹs Information Security Management System (ISMS) complies with ISO 27001. CentralNic is working towards achieving full ISO 27001 certification and has secured the services of Lloydʹs Register Quality Assurance (LRQA), a UKAS accredited certifier for its ISO 27001 certification. A letter from LRQA confirming this engagement is included in Appendix 30(a).1. Stage One of this process is scheduled during May 2012, with Stage Two occurring in July 2012. The ISMS is part of a larger Management System which includes policies and procedures compliant to ISO 9001.

30(a).2. Independent Assessment
As part of ISO 27001 compliance, CentralNicʹs security policies will be subjected to annual external audit. Further details can be found in response to question #30(b).

30(a).3. Augmented Security Levels
WME believes that the TLD requires no additional security levels above those expected of any gTLD registry operator. Nevertheless, WME and CentralNic will operate the TLD to a high level of security and stability in keeping with its status as a component of critical Internet infrastructure.
Registry systems are hardened against attack from external and internal threats. Access controls are in place and all systems are monitored and audited to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, distribution or modification of sensitive data assets. The Authoritative DNS System has been designed to meet the threat of Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks by means of over-provisioning of network bandwidth, and deployment of Shared Unicast (ʺAnycastʺ) addresses on nameservers. Whois services have been designed with built-in rate limiting and include mechanisms for protection of personal information. The stability of the registry is supported by use of high-availability technologies including a ʺhotʺ Disaster Recovery site in the Isle of Man, as well as a backup provider relationship with GMO Registry in Japan.

30(a).4. Commitments to Registrars
WME and CentralNic will make the following commitments to the TLD registrars:
• The SRS will be operated in a secure manner. Controls will be in place to prevent unauthorized access and modification of registry data.
• The Whois service will prevent unauthorized bulk access to domain name registration data, and provide tools to protect personal information.
• The DNS system will be designed to provide effective defense against DDoS attacks. The registry will proactively monitor the DNS system to provide early warning against threats to the stability of the TLD.
• The DNSSEC system will be operated in accordance with best practices and recommendations as described in the relevant RFC documents (described in response to question #43).
• Security incidents reported by registrars, registrants and other stakeholders will be acted upon in accordance with the Security Incident Response Policy (see below).
• Security vulnerabilities reported to the registry will be acknowledged and remediated as quickly as possible.
• Registrars will be promptly notified of all incidents that affect the security and stability of the registry system and their customers, and will be kept informed as incidents develop.

30(a).5. Access Controls
CentralNic operates an access control policy for the registry system. For example, the web-based Staff Console which is used to administer the SRS and manage registrar accounts supports a total of ten different access levels, ranging from ʺTraineeʺ, who has read-only access to a subset of features, to ʺSystem Administratorʺ who has full access to all systems.
Underlying server and network infrastructure is also subjected to access control. A centralized configuration manager is used to centrally control access to servers. Individual user accounts are created, managed and deleted via the configuration server. Access to servers is authenticated by means of SSH keys: only authorized keys may be used to access servers. Operations personnel can escalate privileges to perform administration tasks (such as updating software or restarting daemons) using the ʺsudoʺ command which is logged and audited as described below.
Only operations personnel have access to production environments. Development personnel are restricted to development, staging and OT&E environments.

30(a).6. Security Enforcement
Security controls are continually monitored to ensure that they are enforced. Monitoring includes use of intrusion detection systems on firewalls and application servers. Attempted breaches of access controls (for example, port scans or web application vulnerability scans) trigger NOC alerts and may result in the execution of the Security Incident Response Policy (see below).
Since CentralNic operates a centralized logging and monitoring system (see response to question #42), access logs are analyzed in order to generate access reports which are then reviewed by NOC personnel. This includes access to servers via SSH, to web-based administration systems, and to security and networking equipment. Unexpected access to systems is investigated with a view to correcting any breaches and⁄or revoking access where appropriate.

30(a).8. Security Incident Response Policy
CentralNic operates a Security Incident Response Policy which applies to all events and incidents as defined by the policy, and to all computer systems and networks operated by CentralNic.

The Policy provides a mechanism by which security events and incidents are defined (as observable change to the normal behavior of a system attributable to a human root cause). It also defines the conditions under which an incident may be defined as escalated (when events affect critical production systems or requires that implementation of a resolution that must follow a change control process) and emergencies (when events impact the health or safety of human beings, breach primary controls of critical systems, or prevent activities which protect or may affect the health or safety of individuals).
The Policy established an Incident Response Team which regularly reviews status reports and authorizes specific remedies. The IST conducts an investigation which seeks to determine the human perpetrator who is the root cause for the incident. Very few incidents will warrant or require an investigation. However, investigation resources like forensic tools, dirty networks, quarantine networks and consultation with law enforcement may be useful for the effective and rapid resolution of an emergency incident.
The Policy makes use of CentralNicʹs existing support ticketing and bug tracking systems to provide a unique ID for the event, and means by which the incident may be escalated, information may be reported, change control processes put into effect, and ultimately resolved. The Policy also describes the process by which an incident is escalated to invoke an Emergency Response, which involves Lock-Down and Repair processes, monitoring and capturing of data for forensic analysis, and liaison with emergency services and law enforcement as necessary.

30(a).9. Role of the Network Operations Centre (NOC)
In addition to its role in managing and operating CentralNicʹs infrastructure, the NOC plays a key role in managing security. The NOC responds to any and all security incidents, such as vulnerability reports received from registrars, clients and other stakeholders; monitoring operator and security mailing lists (such as the DNS-OARC lists) to obtain intelligence about new security threats; responding to security-related software updates; and acting upon security alerts raised by firewall and intrusion detection systems.

30(a).10. Information Security Team
CentralNic maintains an Information Security Team (IST) to proactively manage information security. The IST is a cross-functional team from relevant areas of CentralNic. These key members of staff are responsible for cascading rules, regulations and information to their respective departments. They are also the first port of call for their departmental staff to report potential security incidences and breaches, the IST are all members of an internal email group used to co-ordinate and discuss security related issues.
The IST is comprised of the CEO, CTO, Operations Manager, Senior Operations Engineer and Security Engineer.
IST responsibilities include:
• Review and monitor information security threats and incidents.
• Approve initiatives and methodologies to enhance information security.
• Agree and review the security policy, objectives and responsibilities.
• Review client requirements concerning information security.
• Promote the visibility of business support for information security company-wide.
• Manage changes to 3rd party services that may impact on Information Security
• Perform internal audits with the assistance of Blackmores.

30(a).11 Auditing and Review
ISO 27001 includes processes for the auditing and review of security systems and policies. Audits are performed annually by an independent assessor. The IST periodically reviews the ISMS and conducts a gap analysis, identifying areas where performance does not comply with policy, and where the Risk Assessment has identified the need for further work.

30(a).12. Testing of Controls and Procedures
CentralNic will conduct bi-annual penetration tests of its registry systems to ensure that access controls are properly enforced and that no new vulnerabilities have been introduced to the system. Penetration tests will include both ʺblack boxʺ testing of public registry services such as Whois and the Registrar Console, ʺgrey boxʺ testing of authenticated services such as EPP, and tests of physical security at CentralNicʹs offices and facilities.
CentralNic will retain the services of a reputable security testing company such as SecureData (who, as MIS-CDS, performed the 2009 assessment of CentralNicʹs security stance). The results of this test will be used in annual reviews and audits of the ISMS.

30(a).13. Applicant Security Policy
WME will manage the .WME TLD under the same level of security protections as it currently operates its existing business. WME’s existing business management entails highly confidential business and personal private information and for the purpose of keeping such secure WME has a Security Policy in place including but not limited to: has physical security measures including locked offices, visitor log, etc. WME uses best practices in computer security (screen locks, password policy, & antivirus updates done regularly). WME has network security (firewalls, secured wifi, secured cabling and network cabinets, network activity logging). WME uses data security (encrypted storage of files and credentials).

It is not anticipated that WME in its operation of .WME needs to enhance site and network security measures in addition to policy development, employee training, and enhanced physical security measures. Specifically it should be noted that the .WME TLD is a single-registrant registry and for that purpose any security breach will affect WME and not the general public or other specific entities (no registrants exists beyond WME). WMEʹs detailed Security Policy is considered highly confidential and is not distributed here for privacy concerns related to WMEʹs existing business.

Adam Venit	Director
Ari Emanuel	Director
Dave Wirtschafter	Director
Jennifer Rudolph-Walsh	Director
Mark Itkin	Director
Patrick Whitesell	Director
Peter Grosslight	Director
Rick Rosen	Director

New gTLD Application Submitted to ICANN by: William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC

String: WME

Originally Posted: 13 June 2012

Application ID: 1-930-41059

Applicant Information

1. Full legal name

2. Address of the principal place of business

3. Phone number

4. Fax number

5. If applicable, website or URL

Primary Contact

6(a). Name

6(b). Title

6(c). Address

6(d). Phone Number

6(e). Fax Number

6(f). Email Address

Secondary Contact

7(a). Name

7(b). Title

7(c). Address

7(d). Phone Number

7(e). Fax Number

7(f). Email Address

Proof of Legal Establishment

8(a). Legal form of the Applicant

8(b). State the specific national or other jursidiction that defines the type of entity identified in 8(a).

8(c). Attach evidence of the applicant's establishment.

9(a). If applying company is publicly traded, provide the exchange and symbol.

9(b). If the applying entity is a subsidiary, provide the parent company.

9(c). If the applying entity is a joint venture, list all joint venture partners.

Applicant Background

11(a). Name(s) and position(s) of all directors

11(b). Name(s) and position(s) of all officers and partners

11(c). Name(s) and position(s) of all shareholders holding at least 15% of shares

11(d). For an applying entity that does not have directors, officers, partners, or shareholders: Name(s) and position(s) of all individuals having legal or executive responsibility

Applied-for gTLD string

13. Provide the applied-for gTLD string. If an IDN, provide the U-label.

14(a). If an IDN, provide the A-label (beginning with "xn--").

14(b). If an IDN, provide the meaning or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applicant.

14(c). If an IDN, provide the language of the label (in English).

14(c). If an IDN, provide the language of the label (as referenced by ISO-639-1).

14(d). If an IDN, provide the script of the label (in English).

14(d). If an IDN, provide the script of the label (as referenced by ISO 15924).

14(e). If an IDN, list all code points contained in the U-label according to Unicode form.

15(a). If an IDN, Attach IDN Tables for the proposed registry.

15(b). Describe the process used for development of the IDN tables submitted, including consultations and sources used.

15(c). List any variant strings to the applied-for gTLD string according to the relevant IDN tables.

16. Describe the applicant's efforts to ensure that there are no known operational or rendering problems concerning the applied-for gTLD string. If such issues are known, describe steps that will be taken to mitigate these issues in software and other applications.

17. (OPTIONAL) Provide a representation of the label according to the International Phonetic Alphabet (http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/ipa/).

Mission/Purpose

18(a). Describe the mission/purpose of your proposed gTLD.

18(b). How do you expect that your proposed gTLD will benefit registrants, Internet users, and others?

18(c). What operating rules will you adopt to eliminate or minimize social costs?

Community-based Designation

19. Is the application for a community-based TLD?

20(a). Provide the name and full description of the community that the applicant is committing to serve.

20(b). Explain the applicant's relationship to the community identified in 20(a).

20(c). Provide a description of the community-based purpose of the applied-for gTLD.

20(d). Explain the relationship between the applied-for gTLD string and the community identified in 20(a).

20(e). Provide a description of the applicant's intended registration policies in support of the community-based purpose of the applied-for gTLD.

20(f). Attach any written endorsements from institutions/groups representative of the community identified in 20(a).

Geographic Names

21(a). Is the application for a geographic name?

Protection of Geographic Names

22. Describe proposed measures for protection of geographic names at the second and other levels in the applied-for gTLD.

Registry Services

23. Provide name and full description of all the Registry Services to be provided.

Demonstration of Technical & Operational Capability

24. Shared Registration System (SRS) Performance

25. Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)

26. Whois

27. Registration Life Cycle

28. Abuse Prevention and Mitigation

29. Rights Protection Mechanisms

30(a). Security Policy: Summary of the security policy for the proposed registry

© Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers.